[stock-market-ticker symbols=" ^NYA;CRYPTO:BTC;CRYPTO:ETH;CRYPTO:USDT;CRYPTO:USDC;CRYPTO:BNB;CRYPTO:ADA;CRYPTO:XRP;CRYPTO:SOL;CRYPTO:DOGE " stockExchange="NYSENASDAQ" width="100%" transparentbackground=1 palette="financial-light"]

Get the latest news and updates on FINTECH.TV

Stablecoins Do Not Need One Global Regulator : They Need Regulators Who Trust Each Other

Kokila Alagh, Leading Technology and Corporate Lawyer and Board Member and Head of the Legal and Regulatory Working Group at MESA, joins Rachel Pether at the ADX to deliver the clearest legal framework for understanding what global stablecoin regulation actually requires, and what it does not.

Her most important reframe is on harmonisation: it is not the goal and should not be the goal. A stablecoin can be issued in one jurisdiction, with infrastructure in another, reserves somewhere else, and redemption happening all over the world. No single rule can govern that. What is needed instead is cooperation, equivalence, and recognition, regulators trusting each other’s frameworks enough to let cross-border stablecoin transactions flow within a safe, supervised perimeter. That is achievable. A single global rulebook is not.

On MESA’s credibility with its commercial members, her answer is precise: MESA is a DIFC-incorporated non-profit with a clear charter. It is not a lobby. Its activities are defined, education, research, policy dialogue, and advocacy around legitimate usage and adoption of digital assets. Doing the right thing in the right way is not just a motto, it is the operating constraint.

Advertisement

Latest articles

Related articles