[stock-market-ticker symbols=" ^NYA;CRYPTO:BTC;CRYPTO:ETH;CRYPTO:USDT;CRYPTO:USDC;CRYPTO:BNB;CRYPTO:ADA;CRYPTO:XRP;CRYPTO:SOL;CRYPTO:DOGE " stockExchange="NYSENASDAQ" width="100%" transparentbackground=1 palette="financial-light"]

Get the latest news and updates on FINTECH.TV

Stablecoins Are Not a Threat to Banks : They Depend on the Very System They Disrupt

Ilham Tamimi, Senior Compliance, Financial Crime and Governance Executive and Founding Board Member of the Middle East Stablecoin Association, joins Rachel Pether at the ADX as one of the region’s most experienced voices on the intersection of compliance and digital assets reframes the stablecoin conversation.

Her most important point is the one the industry keeps getting wrong: stablecoins are not a threat to banks. They are a disruption, and the irony is that they depend on the very system they disrupt, relying on banks for reserve requirements, traditional audits, and rails. What stablecoins are doing is renovating the banking industry, not replacing it.

On which global regulatory approach the rest of the world will copy, GENIUS Act, MiCA, or the UAE framework, her answer cuts through the debate: stablecoins are borderless by nature, so no single jurisdiction can contain them. America gave stablecoins scale and legitimacy. Europe gave them comprehensiveness. The UAE gave them speed and clarity. Each contribution matters, and MESA’s corridor work, approaching 15 active corridors from Hong Kong to Vietnam to the UK — is building the interoperability that makes the global picture work.

Advertisement

Latest articles

Related articles