[stock-market-ticker symbols=" ^NYA;CRYPTO:BTC;CRYPTO:ETH;CRYPTO:USDT;CRYPTO:USDC;CRYPTO:BNB;CRYPTO:ADA;CRYPTO:XRP;CRYPTO:SOL;CRYPTO:DOGE " stockExchange="NYSENASDAQ" width="100%" transparentbackground=1 palette="financial-light"]

Get the latest news and updates on FINTECH.TV

Banks Are All In on AI, But 90% Never Make It Past the Pilot Stage

Musata Matei, Ventures, Partnerships and Engagement at FAB’s AI Innovation Hub and Women in AI Partnerships Lead, joins Raghda Ibraheem with a clear diagnosis: the gap between AI pilots and AI that actually runs a business is not a technology problem. It is an operating model problem.

Capgemini’s data says it all, 33% of financial institutions are developing proprietary AI agents, but only 10% have deployed them at scale. The reason is not the AI itself. It is the difficulty of connecting a good AI demo to a bank’s data systems, security, compliance, and risk frameworks, and actually giving people a real reason to use it every day.

On how much decision-making AI should be allowed in banking, her answer is principle-driven: the line should be set by the consequence of the decision, not by whether AI is involved. Summarising documents and writing code, give it autonomy. Approving a loan, detecting suspicious activity, or making decisions that materially impact a customer, the threshold must be much higher, with clear accountability, auditability, and human oversight.

As for women in AI, her point is the one most people miss: it is not about training more women in AI. It is about making sure women are connected to the opportunities that training creates, the networks, the rooms, the referrals. If women are not in the room where opportunities are being created, the compounding effect runs in reverse.

Advertisement

Latest articles

Related articles